Navigation

Saturday, February 26, 2011

Watercolor Painting - Near Telluride



Near Telluride
©2011 Steve Penberthy
Watercolor on Strathmore Gemini 140-lb CP paper
15" x 11" (38.1 x 27.9 cm)


I've travelled to Telluride, Colorado many times, and it is one of the most scenic areas I've ever visited.  This view is of a valley meadow just west of town, looking to the east towards the San Juan Mountains and the end of the box canyon in which Telluride is located. (view a photo of this scene from Google Maps)

I painted this scene from a photo I took a few years ago; I was drawn to the scene by the intense blue of the summer sky contrasted against the billowy clouds.  I'd love to say that I just sat down at the paper and, with photo reference at my side, splashed some paint and out came a finished work.  Far from the truth.  It was a long road to get this painting to a composition with which I was satisfied.

Near Telluride, CO
First, I drew a pencil drawing of the scene, and I really liked the dark sky contrasting with the clouds; I knew that the focal point of the painting had to be a spot in the sky with the most contrast between dark and light.  In fact, the drawing really didn't come together until I added very strong darks in the sky.

So, using my pencil sketch as a roadmap, I made an initial quarter-sheet painting.  And I hated it.  I mounted another quarter sheet to my board and painted it again.  A little better this time, but I hated this second one also.  I decided to let it sit for a day or so, so I could "walk around it" so to speak.  In the past, I've had some success in getting a painting to a finished state by letting it lay dormant for a short time, allowing me time to gain some needed objectivity for the things I couldn't see (or think of) during the heat of the painting battle.

So, after a day or so, I looked at the painting again, and made a list of what I thought was wrong or needed correction:
1.  I had failed to get my focal point across; I didn't have enough contrast between dark and light in the sky.
2.  There wasn't much value contrast in the painting as a whole; it was largely middle values.
3.  There was no light; no life.  It looked flat.
4.  The colors were muddy.
5.  I had imprecise edges on the mountains from errant brush strokes and bleeding of the paint.

I started drawing value sketches--a lot of value sketches.  I explored compositional changes, alternatives in value dominance, and even played with the idea of adding some close trees in the foreground as a new center of interest:

Thumbnail exploring compositional
and value alternatives

Should I add a tree in the
foreground as a focal point?


Third set of thumbnails exploring
compositional and value alternatives.
Finally--I like the one in the lower
right-hand corner!
Prototype on
iPhone Brushes app
I finally decided that, instead of making the mountains a middle value (as they were in the photo), I would represent them as a dark, thin shape.  The skies would remain a middle value, the foreground a light value (the yellow I used in the final painting reads as a light value), and the clouds my lightest.  To test whether this made sense using color, I quickly prototyped the painting using the Brushes app on my iPhone, as shown at left.

Finally satisfied with the values and composition, the painting came together.  And I addressed the muddy colors by giving my palette and brushes a much-needed cleaning.

It was a fun day in the studio, but it was the work of the initial attempts, objective analysis, and thumbnail sketches that brought it all together.

I don't go through this process with all of my paintings; in fact, I probably did a better job than I ever have at trying to critically analyze what wasn't working.  I learned a lot!

Enjoy!
Steve

7 comments:

Tom Myler said...

Wow, what an interesting process. The idea of doing a prototype on the iPhone is very creative. Even though my form of art is photography instead of watercolor, I learned a lot of applicable thinking from this. Thanks.

moss said...

Thank you so much for this post!! It is a great peek into your process and YES I would have totally asssumed that you splashed that paint on perfectly the first time.

I have one more question: How did you keep from giving up? I find that with just a photo in front of me it's easy to lose interest. Were you just determined to paint that particular scene and that kept you going?

Steve Penberthy said...

-Tom: Thanks! I'll be interested to see your application of this process!

Steve Penberthy said...

-Moss: That's a great question, and thanks--you really made me think. I think there's two reasons I kept pushing: (1) I've done several paintings in the past that feature skies & clouds, so I knew I could do better than what my first couple of attempts gave me. (2) I was very unhappy about the painting being almost all middle values; it just had no life--nd I knew I could make it better. All these middle values were coming from the photo in the form of green pasture, green mountains, blue skies. So, I had to invent new values for the mountain shapes to make a more pleasing composition. But for some reason, this just wasn't hitting me until I sat down and analyzed my two unsatisfying attempts. In summary, I think I was driven to overcome the challenges; not to let the painting beat me.

Nick G. Swift said...

That’s one of the bluest blues I’ve ever seen. It’s not ultramarine is it, maybe cobalt? The diagrams are a very useful addition.
Thank you
Swift
www.nickgswift.com

Steve Penberthy said...

Nick: Thanks for the comment! That blue is Cobalt Blue by Holbein, and I got that intensity by using it pretty much straight out of the tube on damp paper. Thanks for stopping by! -- Steve

Lingerie said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...